Posts Tagged ‘firearms’

On January 29th, 2017, Alexandre Bissonnette implemented a Lone Wolf attack on the Islamic Cultural Centre in Quebec City. Regardless of your opinion of Islam, in a country like Canada, this kind of thing should not happen yet it does.

I look at these kinds of events, as horrific as they are, and I am reminded why I teach Krav Maga for a living. The reality is that no matter how safe you think you are, it only takes one person to rock the boat and remind you that humans can be violent regardless of societal norms or laws.

So one may walk in peace.

The other thing I am reminded of is how little the general public seem to know about, well, a lot of things. I also knew that Canada’s media would immediately, or soon after the attack, take a strike at the already strict gun laws in Canada. In this particular event, the amount of BS I have seen on the internet within hours of the attack were quite shocking. Generally, I give the Canadian media some more points than the American media, for the Canadians tend to wait a little longer for facts to come in the midst of such chaos before spewing out nonsense. However, in this case, they also get the initial details wrong.

Not all terrorist attacks with a single attacker are Lone Wolf attacks, but all Lone Wolf attacks are considered terrorist attacks (most of the time)

Right away, I started seeing politics thrown around and read several articles about the topic of Lone Wolf vs terrorist attacks, with many claiming this attack to be purely terrorist and not Lone Wolf. This tells me that writers of such articles know little about conflict, violence, and terrorism. Aside from the fact that the perpetrator will most likely be charged with terrorism, his attack was most definitely a Lone Wolf attack. The distinction is very important.

As stated, a lone attacker does not signify a Lone Wolf attack, but a Lone Wolf attack is usually terrorism in nature (but not always). To me, a clear distinction is whether or not they had help. If they had help, it is most likely part of a larger terror network, such as Al-Qaeda or some nefariously well-hidden Muslim brotherhood affiliate. Or, to be fair, could also be  is part of some right-wing Neo-Nazi group planning their “big return.” If they did not have help, it is most likely a random guy who woke up one morning and decided to go on a rampage (of course, this is an understatement).

If your general definition of terrorism is simply “to cause terror,” then any violent attack such as a simple murder in a home could be called a terrorist attack since it definitely causes terror in a community. But does this now make such situations terrorism? I am not a big fan of word policing, but sometimes definitions matter, especially when there is so much confusion about specific things.

When a Lone Wolf attack becomes terrorism

Attacks targeting these groups can be considered terrorism:

  • Cultural
  • Ethic
  • Political
  • Religious

Also, if the attack was premeditated in any way, it can also be considered terrorism.

Definitions are important because the right or wrong word can be the difference between accurate or misleading information. Attacks that come from a single person who just snapped one day would be more appropriately termed “mass murder” which is an attack resulting in 5+ deaths depending on the regional definitions. If the media calls a mass murder situation a “terrorist attack,” it would most likely cause public terror since there could be the potential for another attack. However, in the case of the attack in Quebec, while the attacker turned himself in later, it is fairly safe to say it was a terror attack.

Another important reason for distinguishing the concept of a Lone Wolf attack is that it tells you whether or not law enforcement could have done more to stop it. Whenever a terrorist attack is not Lone Wolf and there are links to larger networks, it shows a failure in law enforcement agencies to do their jobs effectively in that particular case. However, in the case of a Lone Wolf attack, it is often unreasonable to blame law enforcement for lacking effort in prevention regardless of whether it is deemed terrorism or mass murder. The fact is Lone Wolf attacks are not on the LE radar and incredibly difficult to predict, especially when it’s by an individual with no criminal records like the Quebec case. Of course, the community could take responsibility to notice the behaviour of those close to them and recognise erratic behaviour in days leading up to an event. For example, family members should pay attention to each other and teachers should pay attention to their students, react appropriately, and possibly report to LE. However, sometimes Lone Wolf attacks can happen without warning.

 

alexandrebissonette

Alexandre Bissonnette

 

The only thing people can do to prepare for the unexpected situations like a Lone Wolf attack is to acquire the skills to protect themselves. The goal of getting people home safely every day is why I’ve dedicated my life to Krav Maga and training people how to avoid fights and how to end conflicts. In the moment of an attack, the people who can really do something to stop the violence are the people hiding in the building. The unfortunate truth is that waiting for LE to show up can be too late.

The political nature of attacks and terrorism

The word “terrorism” in modern times usually refers to Islamic terror, but it isn’t always the case. It is undeniable that Islamic terror is one of the biggest problems in the world, and people who refuse to believe it are incredibly naive, but it is also wrong to think that Caucasian people and Christians don’t participate in terrorist activities. However, there is a difference between the two. By and large, terrorism from Caucasians and Christians nowadays are Lone Wolf attacks by disgruntled and, sometimes, racist people. On the other hand, Islamic terrorism is usually more systematic and linked to large terrorist groups capable of repeat or other attacks.

Again, if you are going to pick a side, then you must understand the distinct and general difference. If you want to get into history, there was a time in which Caucasians had large organized terrorist groups, such as the IRA in England or the Basque in Spain. However, to be realistic, these groups are not a problem at the moment and the immediate threat is Islamic terrorism.

To the left-wing people in Western North America, please stop pretending that Islamic terror is not a problem.

To the right-wing people in Western North America, please stop pretending that Caucasians do not sometimes create plans to cause terror.

 

oklahoma

Oklahoma Bombing

 

A perfect example of the latter is the Oklahoma City Bombing, one of the largest domestic terrorist attacks in American history. One April 19, 1995, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols blew up a Federal building, killing 168 people and injuring hundreds more (which combined with the 9/11 are the largest terrorist attacks on American soil in modern times). This shows how Caucasians can be as dangerous as Islamic terrorists. Over the last several years, there have been numerous attacks in America, such as the Sandy Hook shooting, San Bernardino shooting, and the Charleston S.C. shooting. Notice the trend?

Terror attacks, mass murder, and guns

The anti-gun bandwagon becomes more popular after such attacks, especially when the people with a political motive and the media, for numerous reasons, often jump on the opportunity to blame these attacks on guns. However, the important point to remember is that guns don’t kill people, people kill people. The weapon is nothing without a wielder. If you think about the two largest terror attacks that were just mentioned, they were not perpetrated using guns but with explosives: a massive fertilizer bomb and giant planes.

Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.

While the option of using planes as weapons has now become considerably harder with increasingly strict post-9/11 security measures, it is certainly still possible. The option of using IEDs is even easier and more effective for doing greater damage in a shorter amount of time because anyone with a little bit of chemistry knowledge can create an explosive. As such, firearms as a weapon of terrorism should be the least of people’s concerns. Immediately jumping to the anti-gun rhetoric post-terror events simply shows how little people truly know about violence, conflict, and firearms use.

In addition, Canadians and Americans forget how lucky they are to live in such relatively peaceful countries. In other parts of the world where the violence rate is high, the average person uses guns to defend themselves and the gun culture is very different. People living in North America easily become complacent about safety and security.

Gun laws in Canada

It drives me nuts when Canadians talk about gun laws as if they are living in America, which they are not. In Canada, if you would like to own a gun, you must pass a firearms safety course for non-restricted (rifles) and/or restricted (pistols) firearms, submit your test results to the RCMP, and wait for them to complete a criminal record check on you. If you have no criminal record and have never been committed for a mental illness, then you should receive your license soon after.

In addition, restricted firearms such as pistols are governed by mandatory safe storage laws, which usually require a trigger lock and a locked storage container. While bureaucratic in nature, these gun laws have drastically reduced accidental firearms-related deaths in Canada. (Notice I said “accidental” deaths. Due to these laws, suicide using firearms and death involving children gaining access to firearms have dropped.) Specifically, according to all the data I have seen, the two parts of the laws that have helped reduce firearms-related death are the background checks, including the mental health aspect, and the safe storage regulations. In the case of the Quebec shooting, Bissonnette had no criminal record and had not been committed for mental health issues and have not been reported for unusual behaviour.

With that being said, it is clear that the Brass at the RCMP and many politicians have an anti-gun agenda. They also regularly target the law abiding citizens who own guns (ie. Alberta’s High River Gun Grab in June 2013), so please do not say that gun owners are paranoid about getting their guns stolen and taken away because they are not.

Getting rid of guns would have stopped the Quebec attack, right?

 

niceattack

Lorry used in the Nice attack

If someone is truly committed to performing an attack, they would find a method. Remember the Nice, France attack on July 14, 2016?  Firearms were not the primary method for death, instead, a truck was used. Bissonnette could have just as easily taken a vehicle and driven into the mosque potentially killing and injuring even more people. Guns are not the problem.

 

People think that firearms are the most dangerous way bad people use to take out large groups. This is a myth that people believe because they do not get enough knowledge about violence and conflict. Shooting people in large groups is not the most effective way for mass murder. People have this idea simply because they are fed so much anti-gun propaganda that they believe it. If guns inherently make people wake up and decide they need to cause terror, then death rates would skyrocket in most Western countries because, well, there are a lot of guns there. The average person doesn’t wake up one morning and decide to commit murder.

People are fed so much anti-gun propaganda that they believe it.

Another issue that is more problematic than guns is mental health. It’s hard to deny that majority of the individuals who have committed mass murder in America since 9/11 had some kind of serious mental health issue. Either that or they were part of some gang violence, criminals shooting at other criminals, and thus the media never picked it up.

Finally, one more point about weapons is that people underestimate knives as a danger. I, on the other hand, am more wary of knives than firearms. Any idiot can pick up knives and use them as weapons. Only people with some kind of training can operate firearms to do significant damage. Bissonnette could easily have entered the mosque with a knife, locked the doors, trapped people inside, and started stabbing away. Firearms run out of ammo fast. Knives do not need ammo. He would have had an unlimited method of killing with a knife. For example, the Kunming knife attack in 2014 is a reminder of how quick and easy it is for a knife to yield significant damage. I emphasize this every time I teach knife-related self-defense.

The only one who can protect you is you

I wish that one day, humans would all decide they don’t want to hurt each other and then live in peace. Unfortunately, we are far from that as a species, and people attack each other all the time. What I hope for more is that, more importantly, people would wake up and recognize that humans are humans. You cannot use laws to regulate human nature and fix people’s desire to hurt others. Thus, the thing that people don’t seem to be able to grasp but need to understand is that the real weapon is the human being. The person committing the attack is the real threat and real danger, not the weapon they use. It doesn’t matter if they hold a knife, a gun, a bomb, or drive a vehicle. If a person wants to do something big and bad, they will find a way.

walkinpeaceThe best thing people can do to take real action against this issue is to acquire the skills needed to protect themselves. Whether it’s a mugging, a terrorist or Lone Wolf attack, or a school shooting, only you can protect yourself. To start, practice being alert, vigilant, and aware of your surroundings and situation (aka situational awareness), learn to identify threats immediately and get away (aka avoidance). Otherwise, you would always find yourself as a victim. Situational awareness and avoidance are tactics that people in fairly peaceful places like North America tend to forget. Just because we don’t have drug wars or tribal warfare or civil war doesn’t mean it is safe and that we shouldn’t be wary of danger.

You truly only have yourself.

It doesn’t matter what the media tells you, what you hear, and what you read about terrorism and mass murder. The most important thing you need to know is that in the moment of an attack, you truly only have yourself. Denying yourself the skills to survive is a risk. Are you willing to take that risk?

 

Advertisements

Action Movie Review Guide

Posted: January 10, 2017 by urbantacticskravmaga in Action Movie Review
Tags: , , , , , , ,

New year, new blog category!

Who doesn’t like movies? We certainly do! Quite often, we are asked about our opinion on a certain action movie or the choreography of a certain fighting or shooting scene. We decided to start a new blog section. Behold…

ACTION MOVIE REVIEWS!! (Imagine that said in a loud booming echoing voice…)

#UTKMmovies

Under this blog category, we will review movies that portray real life hand-to-hand combat and tactical action from the perspective of our experts. If you’d like to request a movie, let us know in the comments below, email us, or post on Facebook and Twitter using the hashtag #UTKMmovies.

First, let’s define our ranking scales!

The Categories:

  • Realism (of hand-to-hand combat)
  • Strategy (of the characters)
  • Firearms and Weapons (use and portrayal)
  • Enjoyment (did we like the film)
  • Final rating (an average total)

Each category is scored out of 5 stars, and the average total will be given for the final rating.

Realism

Obviously, a movie can have a variety of hand-to-hand combat styles. Some directors go for a more flashy, unrealistic style of fighting, while some go for more practical and realistic styles. While great, epic action scenes like that in Kill Bill (2003, 2004) are fun to watch, they aren’t exactly the most realistic at times. Not to pick on the Kill Bill series, we love that movie, but movies with scenes we find more realistic will score higher on the star scale and B Movies with “hacky” and unrealistic fight scenes will score low on the point scale.

Strategy

Both the main goodies and baddies have to have some strategy in their action, and obviously we must assess whether they were good whether or not it’s realistic. Running around shooting everything and blowing everything up may look cool, but is it a good strategy? A movie that is just filled with explosions and non-stop action will score low on the star scale. However, if there is an attempt to show a realistic and feasible strategy that is believable, it will score high.

Firearms and Weapons

What would an action movie be with out a little bit of firearms and/or weapons use? Thus, of course in modern action movies, we will also be looking at whether the firearms handling meets our approval or if it’s clearly actor/director improvisation that looks good but is actually total garbage. If other weapons are involved, we will also make a judgement call on whether it is more realistic or simply flashy.

Enjoyment

This is where we rate the movie on all the other factors, including script, character development, and whether we, well… enjoyed it or not. This is a bit more subjective and totally up to the individual blog authors’ likes and tastes. Even if a move is terrible on all other aspects, it may still have some hope.

Final Score

This is the average of all the previous categories, and thus its final score.

Would you like us to review a specific action movie? You can always request via email, or post on Facebook and Twitter using the hashtag #UTKMmovies.

 

 

 

11411993_1740862996140662_4589899392243280299_o

At UTKM’s Tactical Shotgun Course, I’m the one in green.

Until I started doing Krav Maga, I never imagined I would buy and have my own firearms. I mean, I live in the city. I can’t really use it for self-defense as it is not stored at my house. I don’t hunt. I rarely go hiking deep enough in the wilderness to carry a gun for protection against animals, such as bears. Let’s not forget the legality issues of owning firearms in Canada.

Before joining Urban Tactics Krav Maga, I have had a small amount of shooting experience with various firearms. I have shot rifles at my friends’ and family’s farms, handguns at a range on a couple of occasions, and even an under and over shotgun. Through UTKM, I have gained my CFSC and undertook Level 1, 2, and 3 of their Tactical Shotgun Courses. Then, I surprised myself by considering to purchase my first firearm. What am I going to do with a gun?

Two reasons why I chose the shotgun

superb-high-definition-desktop-wallpapers-of-shotgun#1 Simplicity. Doesn’t everyone like simplicity? As far as I can tell, the shotgun is the simplest firearm, and that’s right down my alley. How simple, you ask? Well, mechanically it is pretty basic, and therefore less likely to jam or break. It is also simple to shoot: you point the dangerous end towards what you want to hit and squeeze the trigger. Pump the action, and repeat. Simple, right? I know, I know. I am ignoring plenty of important elements here, but you see what I am saying.

#2 It suits me. Shotguns fit my personality. Handguns are sexy, close-range weapons. Not my style. Rifles are high precision shooting machines. Me and precision? Not even close acquaintances. Shotguns are… simple. Just like a basic digital camera. You point and shoot.

Wait a second… Isn’t reason two basically the same as reason one? Yup. So… I bought a shotgun.

Tips for first time firearm buyers

First things first. Try out the gun you want, or something very similar, first before you make a decision. It sounds like common sense, but guess what? Common sense is not so common. If you want to buy a gun for the first time, like a sleek and sexy Glock 17, don’t go and shoot with a side-by-side shotgun. They are worlds apart! Some shooting ranges have firearms that you can “rent,” even if you don’t have your CFSC. Take my advice, go find the gun you like and give it a shot.

Second things second. Start with a non-restricted firearm, before stepping up to a restricted one. Say you want to buy a handgun. You have your CRFSC and your cash. Ready? Not quite. You need a permit to transport, which you will definitely be asked to present when you try to get that restricted firearm. Do you want to get flagged by the RCMP? Go right ahead and buy a restricted firearm first time around. If not, purchase a non-restricted firearm first and learn to use that, and then move on to the restricted firearms.

So why do I need a gun?

Josh HensmanI don’t. BUT, I feel much more comfortable knowing how a shotgun operates, and being able to continually get more familiar with a shotgun. My shotgun! I know how to ensure the safety is engaged and how to eject the rounds. I am happier knowing that if I ever end up in a situation in which I have to disarm someone with a shotgun, I will be confident. Thus, my answer is I don’t need a firearm. I want one. And now, I have one.

 

lovelydisgrace-com-grizzyl-bear-attack-4

A student of mine, Geoff, asked me “I am doing a one month long canoeing trip up in the Yukon, and I would like to get a bear defense gun. What would you suggest?“. Truth be told, I have no clue what kind of firearm or caliber of ammo is appropriate for bear defense. The only firearm related to a bear defense course that I have taken is my Wildness Survival course with the Canadian army, and all we use is Bird Shot. In general, the instructor told us the bears in this region are pretty well fed so you should be fine. We were issued a Reignmonton 870 shotgun with four rounds of bird shot and we were out in the wild for four days on our own.

I have to confess that I am slightly afraid of bears after seeing these great creatures in sanctuary, the zoo and the wild. I have also heard many stories about bears from seasonal hunters, park rangers, and army buddies, and I hope I will never run into a bear in the wild in this lifetime. Based upon my research, it might be better to use bear spray instead firearms to protect yourself in the wild. Overall, bear spray is still a better choice for people who do not wish to devote themselves to be proficient with firearms. A person without good training with a firearm can be more dangerous to others and him or herself in a fight or flight situation. The advantage of bear spray is it works, and the disadvantage of bear spray is it can be affected by the wind and therefore works both ways. According to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service research, almost 50 % of people using guns suffered injuries. However, a trustworthy firearm might give people an additional tool when they are in the wild especially dealing with persistent bears which think you are a meal.

 Bears:

Bears are smart, fast, and powerful. It is the top predator on earth. Bears are omnivorous but they still prefer a meat diet on most occasions and its prey such as moose are often much larger than humans. In North America, there are four species of bears:  Black bear, grizzly bear, brown bear and polar bear.

black-bear-480

A black bear on average weighs 300 pounds, and lives close to humans. The number of black bear attacks on humans is higher than other bears – due to its close range with humans.

grizzly-bear_566_600x450

A grizzly bear on average weighs 700 pounds, lives far away from humans, generally avoids humans, but once provoke will be extremely aggressive.

AK_BrownBear84

A brown bear on average weighs 1000 pounds, lives far away from humans, and in some cases associate humans with food. Brown bear attacks tend to result in serious injury and in some cases death.

00473-06209

A polar bear on average weighs 900 pounds, lives far away from humans, and it will associate humans as food.

In places like the remote wildness of the Yukon, men are at mercy of great bears if they are not careful, but in most cases bears will not attack unless they feel their young ones and themselves are being threatened. Only on some occasions have bears associated humans as food.

Firearms:

After some online research and consulting some hunting and firearm experts, here is the advice I came up for Geoff:

1. Shotgun – Slug

grizzly2

A 12 gauge shotgun is the most common firearm used by people who work in the wild. The ammo people use against a bear is generally a slug. A slug is basically a big chunk of heavy lead. A shotgun slug has enough kinetic energy to take down any big game that includes bears.

46-3

The disadvantage of a shotgun that is not rifle-sighted is that its kinetic energy will decrease significantly beyond 100 yards. A brown bear can run 30 miles per hour which means a bear can run 100 yards in 6 seconds, so you better be able to fire quickly with a shotgun or get a firearm that has better engagement distance than a shotgun with slug. My friend Andrew Clark, a hunter and firearm expert, also suggests adding buckshot in the end of tubular magazine in addition to the slug to increase hit probability; however, buck shot might not have enough penetration power.

The advantage of shotguns is its price. An average shotgun runs from $300- $800 and a box of slugs is cheaper than some rifle ammo. The action on pump guns is very reliable even in the worst environment. You also do not need a special tool to take care of complicated parts on firearms such as a gas regulator. Last but not least, a short shotgun also provide better maneuverability when you are inside your tent; just in case a big fuzzy head decide to sneak in in the middle of night.

 2. Rifle :

The main purpose for my student’s trip is bear defense, not bear hunting. Compared to a shotgun a high caliber rifle seems to be the logical choice. It should be reliable, have a range beyond 100 yards, and be able to project rounds downrange as fast as possible with enough impact to stop a 1000 lb killing machine looking to have a quick meal. So we are looking for either a semi-automatic or lever action type of rifle. This rifle should be able to fit ammo large enough to take down a bear.

Suggested Ammo:

  1. 30-06 ith 180 grain to 220 grain
  2. .300 Magnums-180-220 grain bullets
  3. .300 Winchester Magnum
  4. .270 Winchester
  5. .308 Winchester
  6. .338
  7. .375
  8. 45-70
  9. 454 casull

30-06, .300 Magnum, . 300 …..a shooter needs to be able to place all his or her shots within an 8-inch circle out to 200 yards from a sitting or kneeling position. Anything that is .338s or .375s is more forgivable when comes to shot placement on a bear. Chuck Hawk describes best in his article Firearms for Defense against Bears: “the bullet need to have sufficient caliber (cross sectional area), penetration and deliver sufficient energy to get the job done. It is ideal if the bullet is of the controlled expands on type to maximize shock and tissue destruction, but it must not break-up on heavy bones.” We have to also consider logistics. Many experts all agree that it is best to pick a rifle that uses common rounds. Many of these remote places in the Yukon do not carry a lot of variation of ammo. Luckily, for Geoff’s case weight is not an issue since he is doing a canoeing trip so heavier rifles are also part of the consideration.

 Rifle Choice:  

Semi- Automatic: The advantage of a semi-automatic rifle for bear defense is that it is able to project rounds downrange as fast as possible. However, the delicacy of a semi-automatic rifle might not be suitable for long travel in the wildness. After all, more parts mean more chance that something will break.

Browning BAR series

Browning-BAR-Mark-II-Safari-031001-690l

Anything made by Browning is a good choice. After all, the Canadian Army is still using Browning High Power as a standard issue side arm. BAR uses .30-06, 300 Win Mag, 270 Win

Benili R1 Big game rifle series

r1-big-game-rifle

Benili R1 is Benili’s new line of semi- automatic hunting rifle. R1 runs 30-06 Springfield, .300 Win Mag, .338 Win Mag.

Lever action rifle : Marlin – Model 336C , Classical Model 1895, XLR. Browning – BLR, Henry – 45- 70. Lever action rifle has strong recoil but has fewer pieces inside compared to a semi-automatic rifle. In some way it is more reliable. The shooter has to really train to shoot a lever action rifle to compensate for the recoil and muzzle movement.

grizzly_custom_guns_backpacker_scout_marlin_package_lever_action_sbr_short_barreled_rifle_6

The disadvantage of using a rifle dealing with bear attacks is that if you shot a Alaska Brown bear that is charging at you from 300 yards you might be out of luck explaining that to a Conservation Officer. Very much like self defense against humans, you are not allowed to shoot someone out of distance because you feel threatened.

 Handgun:

2560_5

when chose handgun against bear ! be Dirty Harry

.
Handgun is a really good choice for people who travel in the wild. Handguns are easy to carry and can be readily used if needed. Calibers such as.357 Magnum bullet and .44 Magnum is sufficient enough to deal with bears. Sadly in Canada, it is hard to obtain an open carry permit for handguns. People can still obtain it if one can prove that one works in the field frequently, for example, a geologist.

Shooting Skill:

Regardless of the type of firearms you are going to get, you should be able to place a well aimed shot with the first shot and the rest of the shots should immediately follow. You need to have nerves of steel facing a charging bear and strong enough to control the recoil of the rifle and muzzle. Immediate action such as reloading or changing the weapon should always be conducted after you empty the magazine.

We Canadians love our wildness. We take every chance we can get to immerse ourselves in the wild but we should not forget to be humble in front of Mother Nature. Once we step in the woods, we are part of the food chain and are no longer the top predator without our tools.

Reference:

  1. http://www.chuckhawks.com/firearms_defense_bears.htm
  2. http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/?adfg=livingwithbears.bearcountry
  3. Andrew Clark, firearm expert & hunter
  4. http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/grizzly/bear%20spray.pdf
dotz04120604small_cropped_big
Our IDF Tactical Rifle Level 01 course is based on rifle drills and tactics from Israeli Defense Forces and Canadian Army.  Course candidates will learn the fundamental drills of rifle shooting and handling. They will use these skills as foundation for small arms combat & defense. Rifle drills of Israel Defense forces are straight forward and simple just like Krav Maga. Under extreme stress, people tend to lose their fine motor control and rely on gross motor control to fight out of dangers. IDF tactical rifle courses teach you how to fight with your rifle not merely just how to shoot your rifles.
Course will cover:
1. Basic Rifle Marksman principles
2. Shooting position –  standing, prone, kneeling  & transition from each position.
3. Reload & Tactical Reload
4. stoppage drills
5. Zeroing ( Method of Adjustment )  – basically teach you how to adjust sight on a rifle. If you don’t know how to do that, your aim will always be OFF
6. Ballistic Affect on Metal Plate and different objects ( 5.56 x 45 mm and 7.62 x 39 mm)
7. engaging numerous targets in different distance.
8. Press check drill
Cost: $ 350.  Include Rifle ( CZ 858 )  &  300  rds 7.62 x 39 mm AMMO
Instructors:
IMG00109-20110502-1151
Jonathan Fader
Jonathan Fader was a formal sniper with the 84th infantry brigade of the Israel Defense Forces.
  1. Basic Infantry Training (IDF)
  2. Advanced Infantry Training (IDF )Negev Light Machine Gun Operator (IDF)
  3. M-24 Sniper Weapons System Operator (IDF)
  4. H.S Precision HTR 2000 .338 Sniper Weapons System Operator (IDF)
  5. Infantry Sniper School (School of Sniping and Counter Terrorism (IDF))